BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Sabre//Sabre VObject 4.5.8//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Zurich
X-LIC-LOCATION:Europe/Zurich
TZURL:http://tzurl.org/zoneinfo/Europe/Zurich
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:19810329T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=-1SU
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:19961027T030000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=10;BYDAY=-1SU
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:news277@english.philhist.unibas.ch
DTSTAMP;TZID=Europe/Zurich:20201124T115022
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Zurich:20201201T130000
SUMMARY:Complexity\, Accuracy\, Fluency\, and Lexis (CAFL) in L2 Developmen
 t: A Dynamic Usage-based Investigation of Differences Across Modalities an
 d Contexts
DESCRIPTION:Measuring second language (L2) proficiency and development has 
 long been a disputatious topic in second language acquisition (SLA) resear
 ch (Leclercq et al.\, 2014). One common way of tapping change in L2 perfor
 mance has been to analyze learner speech and writing through the subdomain
 s of complexity\, accuracy\, fluency\, and lexis (CAFL)\, which has eventu
 ally become an L2 assessment framework (Norris & Ortega\, 2009). However\,
  SLA research has failed to document that each CAFL construct conjointly d
 evelops over time (Bulte & Housen\, 2020). By the same token\, expecting l
 inear change in longitudinal learner performance data has been challenged 
 by the dynamic usage-based perspectives (DUB) as this strand of SLA resear
 ch has proved empirical evidence for non-linear developmental trends in L2
  performance over time (Verspoor\, 2017). Especially given the high degree
  of variation in individual learning trajectories\, it has been claimed th
 at levelling off individual scores and using group means to generalize ind
 ividual gains could be methodologically risky and misleading (Lowie & Vers
 poor\, 2019). Therefore\, alternative methodologies using non-linear advan
 ced modelling techniques have been called upon to capture these highly var
 ied developmental patterns in longitudinal designs (Lowie & Verspoor\, 201
 9\; Murakami\, 2016).\\r\\nMotivated by the above-mentioned gaps in the li
 terature\, this longitudinal study pertains to the dynamic relationship am
 ong linguistic performance constructs as CAFL across contexts over time th
 rough a cross-sectional quantitative and qualitative analysis of learner p
 erformance data. Taking a DUB approach (Behrens\, 2009\; Verspoor & Behren
 s\, 2011)\, this study explores any form of systematicity in CAFL construc
 ts as indicators of language development. Additionally\, taking one compon
 ent of CAFL\, syntactic complexity development in the form of subordinatio
 n\, this study looks for empirical evidence for systematicity of interlang
 uage. In reference to the systematicity of language as a DUB system\, this
  study also investigates the development of one type of form-use-meaning-m
 appings (FUMMs\, Verspoor\, 2017) in the form of infinitival and gerundial
  verb complement structures (VC) in a cross-sectional design. Finally\, th
 e current study aims to create a computerized model to predict L2 performa
 nce over CAFL measures pertaining to language modalities (e.g.\, written a
 nd spoken)\, context (study abroad vs. at home formal instruction)\, task 
 types\, and proficiency levels. The longitudinal written data for this stu
 dy come from the Study Abroad Language Acquisition project (SALA\, Perez-V
 idal\, 2014). A subcorpus of diaries from this project was compiled by the
  researcher\, consisting of 110K words from 12 sojourners (tertiary level 
 Spanish/Catalan bilinguals learning English as an L2) who provided one dia
 ry entry per week (a total of 175 texts) over an academic semester (12-17 
 weeks) abroad in an Anglophone context. The dataset was first transformed 
 into CHAT format and then coded for CAFL measures using CLAN (MacWhinney\,
  2000). The dataset was also coded and explored for infinitival and gerund
 ial VCs via AntConc (Anthony\, 2019). Spoken data from the Longitudinal Da
 tabase of Learner English (LONGDALE\, Meunier & Littré\, 2013) will be an
 alyzed for oral development upon its release in 2021. In the session\, pre
 liminary observations and textual and virtual explorations of the dataset 
 will also be presented to discuss several DUB phenomena in the dataset.\\r
 \\nIf you would like to listen to this talk\, please contact Dr. Zeynep K
 öylü (zeynep.koylu@unibas.ch [mailto:zeynep.koylu@unibas.ch]) to obtain 
 the necessary Zoom link. \\r\\nReferences\\r\\nAnthony\, L. (2019). AntCon
 c (Version 3.5.8) [Computer Software]. Tokyo\, Japan: Waseda University. B
 ehrens\, H. (2008). Corpora in language acquisition research: History\, me
 thods\, perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Behrens\, H. (2009). Usage
 -based and emergentist approaches to language acquisition. Linguistics\, 4
 7\, 383–411. doi:10.1515/ling.2009.014Bulte\, B.& Housen\, A. (2020). A 
 DUB-inspired case study of multidimensional L2 complexity development: Com
 peting or connecting growers? In W. Lowie\, M. Michel\, A. Rousse-Malpat\,
  M. Keijzer\, and R. Steinkrauss\, Usage-Based Dynamics in Second Language
  Development (pp. 50-87). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Lowie\, W. M.\, & 
 Verspoor\, M. H. (2019). Individual differences and the ergodicity problem
 . Language Learning\, 69\, 184-206.MacWhinney\, B. (2000). The CHILDES p
 roject: Tools for analyzing talk. Mahwah\, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
 .Meunier\, F. and Littré\, D. (2013). Tracking Learners' Progress: Adopti
 ng a Dual ‘Corpus cum Experimental Data’Approach. The Modern Language
  Journal\, 97(S1)\, 61-76.Murakami\, A. (2016). Modeling systematicity an
 d individuality in nonlinear second language development: The case of Engl
 ish grammatical morphemes. Language Learning\, 66(4)\, 834-871.Norris\, 
 J. M.\, & Ortega\, L. (2009). Towards an organic approach to investigating
  CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied linguistics\, 30
 (4)\, 555-578.Pérez-Vidal\, C. (2014). Language acquisition in study abr
 oad and formal instruction contexts. John Benjamins Publishing Company.Ver
 spoor\, M. H. (2017). Complex dynamic systems theory and L2 pedagogy: Less
 ons to be learned. In L. Ortega and Z. Han (Eds)\, Complexity theory and l
 anguage development: In celebration of Diane Larsen-Freeman\, (pp. 143-163
 ). Philadelphia\, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Co.Verspoor\, M.H.\, & Beh
 rens\, H. (2011). Dynamic systems theory and a usage-based approach to sec
 ond language development. In M. H. Verspoor\, K. de Bot\, & W. Lowie (Eds.
 )\, A dynamic approach to second language development (pp. 25-38). Philade
 lphia\, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Co.Verspoor\, M. H.\, Schmid\, M. S.
 \, & Xu\, X. (2012). A dynamic usage based perspective on L2 writing. Jou
 rnal of Second Language Writing\, 21(3)\, 239-263.
X-ALT-DESC:<p>Measuring second language (L2) proficiency and development ha
 s long been a disputatious topic in second language acquisition (SLA) rese
 arch (Leclercq et al.\, 2014). One common way of tapping change in L2 perf
 ormance has been to analyze learner speech and writing through the subdoma
 ins of complexity\, accuracy\, fluency\, and lexis (CAFL)\, which has even
 tually become an L2 assessment framework (Norris &amp\; Ortega\, 2009). Ho
 wever\, SLA research has failed to document that each CAFL construct conjo
 intly develops over time (Bulte &amp\; Housen\, 2020). By the same token\,
  expecting linear change in longitudinal learner performance data has been
  challenged by the dynamic usage-based perspectives (DUB) as this strand o
 f SLA research has proved empirical evidence for non-linear developmental 
 trends in L2 performance over time (Verspoor\, 2017). Especially given the
  high degree of variation in individual learning trajectories\, it has bee
 n claimed that levelling off individual scores and using group means to ge
 neralize individual gains could be methodologically risky and misleading (
 Lowie &amp\; Verspoor\, 2019). Therefore\, alternative methodologies using
  non-linear advanced modelling techniques have been called upon to capture
  these highly varied developmental patterns in longitudinal designs (Lowie
  &amp\; Verspoor\, 2019\; Murakami\, 2016).</p>\n<p>Motivated by the above
 -mentioned gaps in the literature\, this longitudinal study pertains to th
 e dynamic relationship among linguistic performance constructs as CAFL acr
 oss contexts over time through a cross-sectional quantitative and qualitat
 ive analysis of learner performance data. Taking a DUB approach (Behrens\,
  2009\; Verspoor &amp\; Behrens\, 2011)\, this study explores any form of 
 systematicity in CAFL constructs as indicators of language development. Ad
 ditionally\, taking one component of CAFL\, syntactic complexity developme
 nt in the form of subordination\, this study looks for empirical evidence 
 for systematicity of interlanguage. In reference to the systematicity of l
 anguage as a DUB system\, this study also investigates the development of 
 one type of form-use-meaning-mappings (FUMMs\, Verspoor\, 2017) in the for
 m of infinitival and gerundial verb complement structures (VC) in a cross-
 sectional design. Finally\, the current study aims to create a computerize
 d model to predict L2 performance over CAFL measures pertaining to languag
 e modalities (e.g.\, written and spoken)\, context (study abroad vs. at ho
 me formal instruction)\, task types\, and proficiency levels. The longitud
 inal written data for this study come from the Study Abroad Language Acqui
 sition project (SALA\, Perez-Vidal\, 2014). A subcorpus of diaries from th
 is project was compiled by the researcher\, consisting of 110K words from 
 12 sojourners (tertiary level Spanish/Catalan bilinguals learning English 
 as an L2) who provided one diary entry per week (a total of 175 texts) ove
 r an academic semester (12-17 weeks) abroad in an Anglophone context. The 
 dataset was first transformed into CHAT format and then coded for CAFL mea
 sures using CLAN (MacWhinney\, 2000). The dataset was also coded and explo
 red for infinitival and gerundial VCs via AntConc (Anthony\, 2019). Spoken
  data from the Longitudinal Database of Learner English (LONGDALE\, Meunie
 r &amp\; Littré\, 2013) will be analyzed for oral development upon its re
 lease in 2021. In the session\, preliminary observations and textual and v
 irtual explorations of the dataset will also be presented to discuss sever
 al DUB phenomena in the dataset.</p>\n<p>If you would like to listen to th
 is talk\, please contact Dr. Zeynep Köylü (<a href="mailto:zeynep.koylu@
 unibas.ch">zeynep.koylu@unibas.ch</a>) to obtain the necessary Zoom link. 
 </p>\n<p><b>References</b></p>\n<ul><li>Anthony\, L. (2019). AntConc (Vers
 ion 3.5.8) [Computer Software]. Tokyo\, Japan: Waseda University. </li><li
 >Behrens\, H. (2008). Corpora in language acquisition research: History\, 
 methods\, perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.</li><li>Behrens\, H. (2
 009). Usage-based and emergentist approaches to language acquisition. Ling
 uistics\, 47\, 383–411. doi:10.1515/ling.2009.014</li><li>Bulte\, B.&amp
 \; Housen\, A. (2020). A DUB-inspired case study of multidimensional L2 co
 mplexity development: Competing or connecting growers? In W. Lowie\, M. Mi
 chel\, A. Rousse-Malpat\, M. Keijzer\, and R. Steinkrauss\, Usage-Based Dy
 namics in Second Language Development (pp. 50-87). Bristol: Multilingual M
 atters.</li><li>Lowie\, W. M.\, &amp\; Verspoor\, M. H. (2019). Individual
  differences and the ergodicity problem.&nbsp\;<i>Language Learning</i>\,&
 nbsp\;<i>69</i>\, 184-206.</li><li>MacWhinney\, B. (2000). The CHILDES pro
 ject: Tools for analyzing talk. Mahwah\, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.<
 /li><li>Meunier\, F. and Littré\, D. (2013). Tracking Learners' Progress:
  Adopting a Dual ‘Corpus cum Experimental Data’Approach.&nbsp\;The Mod
 ern Language Journal\,&nbsp\;97(S1)\, 61-76.</li><li>Murakami\, A. (2016).
  Modeling systematicity and individuality in nonlinear second language dev
 elopment: The case of English grammatical morphemes.&nbsp\;Language Learni
 ng\,&nbsp\;66(4)\, 834-871.</li><li>Norris\, J. M.\, &amp\; Ortega\, L. (2
 009). Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: 
 The case of complexity.&nbsp\;Applied linguistics\,&nbsp\;30(4)\, 555-578.
 </li><li>Pérez-Vidal\, C. (2014).&nbsp\;Language acquisition in study abr
 oad and formal instruction contexts. John Benjamins Publishing Company.</l
 i><li>Verspoor\, M. H. (2017). Complex dynamic systems theory and L2 pedag
 ogy: Lessons to be learned. In L. Ortega and Z. Han (Eds)\, Complexity the
 ory and language development: In celebration of Diane Larsen-Freeman\, (pp
 . 143-163). Philadelphia\, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Co.</li><li>Versp
 oor\, M.H.\, &amp\; Behrens\, H. (2011). Dynamic systems theory and a usag
 e-based approach to second language development. In M. H. Verspoor\, K. de
  Bot\, &amp\; W. Lowie (Eds.)\, A dynamic approach to second language deve
 lopment (pp. 25-38). Philadelphia\, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Co.</li>
 <li>Verspoor\, M. H.\, Schmid\, M. S.\, &amp\; Xu\, X. (2012). A dynamic u
 sage based perspective on L2 writing.&nbsp\;Journal of Second Language Wri
 ting\,&nbsp\;21(3)\, 239-263.</li></ul>
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Zurich:20201201T140000
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
